Illegal Art

My friend Eric Doeringer is in an interesting show called Illegal Art, dealing with the increasing use of copyright and intellectual property laws to stifle creative works that comment on or borrow from other works and images.

The laws governing "intellectual property" have grown so expansive in recent years that artists need legal experts to sort them all out. Borrowing from another artwork--as jazz musicians did in the 1930s and Looney Tunes illustrators did in 1940s--will now land you in court. If the current copyright laws had been in effect back in the day, whole genres such as collage, hiphop, and Pop Art might have never have existed.

The irony here couldn't be more stark. Rooted in the U.S. Constitution, copyright was originally intended to facilitate the exchange of ideas but is now being used to stifle it.

The Illegal Art Exhibit will celebrate what is rapidly becoming the "degenerate art" of a corporate age: art and ideas on the legal fringes of intellectual property. Some of the pieces in the show have eluded lawyers; others have had to appear in court.

Monthly Archives

Powered by Movable Type 5.2.13

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by published on November 4, 2002 6:14 PM.

Peggy Noonan channels Tupac was the previous entry in this blog.

Go Vote! is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.